Catherine Cornwall on LinkedIn: King County Careers (2024)

Data surveillance is a civil rights problem, and legislation to protect data privacy can help protect civil rights. To be effective, it must include effective private enforcement, and legislation at the federal level must not preempt state legislation. #Civilrights #surveillance #dataprivacy

91

2 Comments

🚓 Explore new horizons in law enforcement leadership! Delve into the challenges of these positions and embark on the next chapter of your professional journey. Click below for more information!#police#policechief#lawenforcement#policejobs#localgov #LawEnforcementLeadership#PublicSafety#CommunityPolicing#LawEnforcementCareers#PoliceLeadership#LawEnforcementExcellence

The Police Federation National Detectives' Forum Chair, DI Ben Hudson, has urged the Government to adopt the Home Office Policing Productivity Review's recommendation to introduce legislative change in the Data Protection Act to allow easy sharing of information between police and the Crown Prosecution Service.PFEW has been campaigning for this since August 2022 through its #SimplifyDG6 campaign – which the Government has refused to support.The review highlighted about 770,000 hours are spent by investigators redacting text material annually. If digital redaction only achieved an 80 per cent saving in time efficiency, this could free up 618,000 hours of investigators’ time. If the recommendation above is in place, then this concerns only 141,416 files and the saving would be 486,471 hours, it cited.DI Hudson said: “Despite the proposed legislative change having been brought before both houses of Parliament on numerous occasions, the Government has refused to support it. “The legally vetted proposed clause would have no direct or indirect disadvantage, or disrupt the fabric of the Data Protection Act, as it ensures security of personal data would not be compromised. It merely seeks to avoid unnecessary, time-wasting redactions.“The reasons for the Government’s apathy are beyond our comprehension and feels misguided.”Read more 👇

40

2 Comments

NEWS UPDATE📰 The Kentucky House unanimously voted in favor of House Bill 15, with a vote of 94-0 on concurrence and final passage. This proposed law, inspired by Virginia's comprehensive legislation, includes mandates for conducting data protection impact assessments, handling deidentified or pseudonymous data, allowing users to opt out of targeted advertising and data sales, and implementing a 30-day cure period. Should it become law, the bill will be enforced starting from January 1, 2026.Read more on https://lnkd.in/dnPTJ5x3#CPRA #CCPA #PrivacyCompliance #DataProtection #PrivacyLaw #Kentucky #USA #Virginia

5

1 Comment

CELL PHONE DATA PRIVACY AFFECTS THE LEGALITY OF THE BLOOD SEARCH WARRANTThe United States Supreme Court Decided A Case With A Rationale That Interestingly Applies To Police Blood Testing And The Blood Search Warrant.The Effects On Our 4thAmendment Protections Against Unreasonable Searches And SeizuresThe Case, United States Vs Carpenter, Holds That The Government May Not Seize Data Concerning Cell Phone Locations Absent An Emergency Or Exigency, And Absent A Search Warrant Issued By A Neutral And Detached Magistrate Who Finds Probable Cause To Do So.BLOOD SEARCH WITHOUT A WARRANTOur 4thAmendment Right Under The Constitution Has A Preference That, For Searches To Be Legal, They Must Be Under The Authority Of A Search Warrant.Although There Are A Few Exceptions To The Warrant Requirement, They Pale In Comparison To The Responsibility That Belongs To The Government For Justifying A Search Without A Warrant.Read full article: https://zcu.io/0GeIFree Consultation ❯❯ 713-999-4434Most Of Our Cases Get Dismissed!1,000s Cases Won & DismissedTrichter ✪ LeGrand ✪ Houlton ✪ White DWI Law Firm#DWI #DUI #DWIlawyer #DWIattorney #AlwaysOpen #WeCanHelp #DWIspecialist #DUIlawyer #DUIattorney #DWIdefense #DUIdefense #DWIdismissed #DUIdismissed #CallDWIattorney

An individual who #unlawfully and intentionally makes #p*rnographicmaterial available to a #child through a computer or information system,with or without the intention of lowering the child’s inhibitions in relation to sexual activity or inducing the #child to have sexual relations with that person is guilty of an offense punishable by a fine or imprisonment. Learn morehttps://bit.ly/3qNhLJo#LawgicalSolutions#JPLP#Zimlaw

Democracy is a process. Earlier this month the data broker lobby presented a bill before the California State Senate to make it illegal for consumers to hire an agent to help them opt out of data broker surveillance. It also made it possible for data brokers to deny the consumer the ability to forbid data brokers from surveilling them, taking their data without consent and opting out of the sale of our own personal information. In California (and other states) you have the right to tell companies to stop surveilling you, and forbid them from selling your private information. They are not allowed to make this difficult, by law and the Attorney General in California has been taking this very seriously with enforcement actions against companies that abuse consumers by frustrating this process. Thanks to all the work done by consumer agent companies, the consumer privacy advocacy groups that have worked tirelessly on this issue and our customers who reached out to lawmakers to voice their opposition to this absurd law, it was officially withdrawn. California is an important battle ground for consumer data privacy rights. The national spotlight is now the focus.There is a lot to worry about with the proposed national privacy law APRA. It does not clearly articulate the consumers' right to opt out and big tech's obligation to abide by that requirement. If APRA is passed without revision, millions and millions of Americans will lose their right to privacy from surveillance by companies they don't know, have now relationship with, who provide no service and who profit from the sale of our privacy. A wolf in sheep's clothing. We will participate in this discussion and advocate for the basic right of human beings to be free from the commercial surveillance of their families and the selling our privacy to anyone willing to pay. But for today, I'm elated that SB 1076 has officially been withdrawn.https://lnkd.in/gRDAAnnr

24

1 Comment

🔐 Virginia Takes a Step Forward in Children's Data Protection 🔍Virginia lawmakers are taking steps to bolster privacy protections for minors with proposed amendments to the VCDPA (HB 1688 / SB 1026). 🧒 If passed, the bills will redefine "child," requiring operators to obtain parental consent for registering users under 18 (previously 13). 🚫 The bills also tackle responsible data processing by operators, aiming to prevent targeted advertising, the sale of personal data, and the profiling of minors. If enacted, these changes would mark significant progress in securing children's privacy online. The bills are currently awaiting committee referral. Stay informed about this significant stride in data protection! 📊 #PrivacyLaw #Virginia #DataProtection #ChildProtection #OnlineSafety 🌐#dataprotection #childprotection Link to the bill: https://lnkd.in/g-7pgzbHTrack the bill's progress: https://lnkd.in/gWfmuGMQ

6

Under the Colorado Privacy Act (CPA), an individual is not permitted to sue a controller. Enforcement falls to the Colorado Attorney General's office and state district attorneys.If your business violates the rules and regulations set forth in the CPA, you are subject to heavy fines of up to $20,000 per violation. To learn more about penalties and fines for CPA violations, check out our latest blog.#VeteransAttorneys #DataPrivacy #Colorado #ColoradoBusiness #ColoradoPrivacyAct #CPAhttps://lnkd.in/gwqRHsAz

1

CELL PHONE DATA PRIVACY AFFECTS THE LEGALITY OF THE BLOOD SEARCH WARRANTThe United States Supreme Court Decided A Case With A Rationale That Interestingly Applies To Police Blood Testing And The Blood Search Warrant.The Effects On Our 4thAmendment Protections Against Unreasonable Searches And SeizuresThe Case, United States Vs Carpenter, Holds That The Government May Not Seize Data Concerning Cell Phone Locations Absent An Emergency Or Exigency, And Absent A Search Warrant Issued By A Neutral And Detached Magistrate Who Finds Probable Cause To Do So.BLOOD SEARCH WITHOUT A WARRANTOur 4thAmendment Right Under The Constitution Has A Preference That, For Searches To Be Legal, They Must Be Under The Authority Of A Search Warrant.Although There Are A Few Exceptions To The Warrant Requirement, They Pale In Comparison To The Responsibility That Belongs To The Government For Justifying A Search Without A Warrant.Read full article: https://zcu.io/0GeIFree Consultation ❯❯ 713-999-4434Most Of Our Cases Get Dismissed!1,000s Cases Won & DismissedTrichter ✪ LeGrand ✪ Houlton ✪ White DWI Law Firm#DWI #DUI #DWIlawyer #DWIattorney #AlwaysOpen #WeCanHelp #DWIspecialist #DUIlawyer #DUIattorney #DWIdefense #DUIdefense #DWIdismissed #DUIdismissed #CallDWIattorney

8